ALGORITHM II: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
: '''1.3.''' The program looks for an absolute extreme (opposite to point 3 extreme) on the segment: | : '''1.3.''' The program looks for an absolute extreme (opposite to point 3 extreme) on the segment: | ||
::- from the last intersection by the price level of the candidate for point 3 (inclusive) (if | ::- from the last intersection by the price level of the candidate for point 3 (inclusive) (if came from 1.2.1.), or :: - from the starting point of the chart (if came from 1.2.2.), or | ||
:: - from 300 bars(if came from 1.2.3.) | |||
:: to point 3 (excluding). | |||
:: '''1.3.1.''' Absolute extreme found. The candidate for point 3 is confirmed; moreover, the found confirming extreme is the assumed (if coming from 1.2.2. or 1.2.3.) starting point of the preceding trend.''' | :: '''1.3.1.''' Absolute extreme found. The candidate for point 3 is confirmed; moreover, the found confirming extreme is the assumed (if coming from 1.2.2. or 1.2.3.) starting point of the preceding trend.''' | ||
::The program checks for the absence of extremes equal to point 3 between the assumed starting point of the previous trend and point 3. | ::The program checks for the absence of extremes equal to point 3 between the assumed starting point of the previous trend and point 3. |
Revision as of 07:45, 25 August 2023
This article is not finished
The N1 rule (N1 requirement) for Algorithm II is as follows: If point 3 is low, then the level of point 5 should be higher than point 1. If point 3 is high, then the level of point 5 should be lower than point 1.
For an accurate understanding of the algorithm, you should get acquainted with UMG General Concepts.
Step I. Search For Point 3 of the External Attraction Model (EAM) and the Sarting Point of the Previous Trend.
- 1.1. The program looks for the first possible extreme, satisfying Single Bar Rule. Such an extreme is a candidate for potential point 3 ( potential t.3).
- 1.2. Next, the program checks the bars from right to left (i.e., in the past) from the bar containing the extreme candidate for point 3 to one of the following events:
- 1.2.1. Found the last intersection (breakthrough) point by the price level of the candidate for point 3.
- In this case, the report displays:
- PREVdata: FullDataPrev
- The program proceeds to substep 1.3.
- 1.2.2. The program reached the starting point of the chart (i.e., the price did not intersect the level of point 3 after the starting point of the chart).
- In this case, the report displays:
- PREVdata: NoFullDataPrev
- The program proceeds to substep 1.3.
- 1.2.1. The price checked 300 bars preceding point 3, but the level of step 3 did not intersect at this segment. The program looks for an absolute extreme (opposite to step 3) on the segment from the 300th bar before point 3 to point 3. The program proceeds to substep 1.3.
- 1.3. The program looks for an absolute extreme (opposite to point 3 extreme) on the segment:
- - from the last intersection by the price level of the candidate for point 3 (inclusive) (if came from 1.2.1.), or :: - from the starting point of the chart (if came from 1.2.2.), or
- - from 300 bars(if came from 1.2.3.)
- to point 3 (excluding).
- 1.3.1. Absolute extreme found. The candidate for point 3 is confirmed; moreover, the found confirming extreme is the assumed (if coming from 1.2.2. or 1.2.3.) starting point of the preceding trend.
- The program checks for the absence of extremes equal to point 3 between the assumed starting point of the previous trend and point 3.
- 1.3.1.1. If such an extreme is found, this candidate for point 3 is discarded, and this point 3 is discarded.
- 1.3.1.2. If such an extreme is not found, the program proceeds to step 2.
- 1.3.2. Absolute extreme not found. This point 3 is discarded.
- Simultaneously with step 1, the program launches the search for the next potential point 3.